I totally agree with ScottInNH and Analog, j0z0r , especially liked wjhat Skeltorr, mewse and fartface had to say. I would love to get superchannel on openwrt. I have almost mastered hostapd and I love what madwifi can do. I have integrated the best op borgbox into a 3.9 MB and 6.9 M firmware and added my own convienient scripts for mdk3 and ettercap. I build in my own multi virtual server freeradius and upgraded to the latest openssl. I had trouble reflashing a pico2HP to the 7M firmware (that previously used to work on the same device) after recompiling it to include my new and improved/corrected configs.
Dd Wrt Super Channel Keygen 24
To enable it, first you should generate a Public/Private key pair on your desktop machine. This can be done through the "Puttygen" utility if you're using either Putty or WinSCP as clients. Copy the public key to the clipboard and save the private key somewhere on your computer. There is no need to save the public key. If you forget it, you can instruct Puttygen to open your private key file rather than generating a new key pair and it will tell you your public key. Users of non-windows environments may use the ssh-keygen(1) utility:
(NOTE: the PuTTY connection fails after web interface login when using PuTTY from the Ubuntu repositories, giving error: "SSH2_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE for nonexistent channel 257" --Brandonc 23:44, 2 August 2012 (CEST))
Fixing the Channel for 5Ghz to 161 with VHT (80+80, upper+upper), gives a transmit rate of 54, nice boost but still nothing magical. Any channel >= 112 performs the same, but below 112 performance drops drastically.
For 2.4Ghz, typically channels 1, 6 and 11 are recommended, with 1 giving the best distance and throughput. And in my setup this is confirmed. Channel 1 performs best. But other channels are just a tiny bit below that.
I did some experiments this evening trying every channels in every extension, recorded the signal and transfer rate(i am using iperf to test the throughput you can get it for free) i will post the result tomorrow morning.
per this documentation Wireless starters guide for first time dd-wrt users higher channel allowed more transmit power output which usually increase signal quality, however based on what I have read the downside is on close range higher transmit power caused more noise.
I recently flashed my NetGear R7000 to the Kong DD-WRT in order to use the VPN service of Private Internet Access (PIA). It went very well, but I am not able to connect to the internet through an ethernet cable. Logging in the router goes just fine through both WifI en Ethernet and surfing the internet through Wifi also. I want to use LAN, as the connection is a lot faster than Wifi (still have to figure out the best channels for optimizing that). Any advice on why this is happening? I always see the lights that reflect the status of the LAN ports on the router being orange instead of white. Here are the instructions that I used to configure the VPN: -support/dd-wrt-openvpn
Even if you operate legally, it's still probably a bad idea for a production environment. 802.11b/g/n were designed to operate over the 14-channel 2.4GHz band, and using it over a completely different band not only is unsupported by most stations but also performance may be affected.
there is no completely different band, it is all 2ghz band. how do you think these APs with 3 or more antennas could get 300Mbps of throughput? running on a single 22mhz channel?!?look what i've discovered:
reghack is the closest that I could find that is comparable to DD-WRT's super channels. A closer look at it, and I don't think that it enables the 2.3GHz band. However, it may still be useful for enabling it (perhaps requiring some patches or as a starting point.)
Are you claiming 2.3GHz or 2.7GHz performs at least as well as 2.4GHz under all circumstances? Would you care to back this up? Normally you design something taking into account the constraints you have. Things like channel width, modulation, noise reduction, etc. do depend on the wave characteristics that you have. When you use something in a way it was not indended, you get into uncharted territory. It may very well function better, but normally it does not.
So you're saying these APs with 3 or more antennas get 300Mbps by... using multiple channels... in the 2.3GHz band? The part of the world where you live is obviously alien to me, but where I live, these APs generally use a 40MHz channel (which is two contiguous 20MHz channels) in the 2.4GHz band. Also, where I live, it's rare to see such 40MHz channels because these APs are not supposed to use such wide channels when they would cause interference with neighbouring APs, which happens often as, both where you and I live, the 2.4GHz band is crowded.
I know for a fact, there have been some Amateur Radio Operators able to access Channels "-2," "-1" and "0" (which channels are completely within the 2.4 GHz licensed Amateur Radio band). I am aware, this is on the other side of the band than you're interested in (below 2.4, not above). Nonetheless, I spoke to the head developer of AREDN to get the information patched into OpenWRT, she never responded to me.
The US Amateur Radio Service does permit certain of its licensees the ability to operate in certain of those bands, with the restriction that the data must not be encrypted, and may not be used for any commercial purpose. So, for all practical purposes, even with that type of license, those channels are "useless" for typical use; no encryption on the wireless, no connecting to commercial websites, no TLS,...
but I am a ham radio, in Cuba nothing is published with respect to the channels here people put the nanos and other ubikiti equipment in compilance test. please can you allude me I just want to unlock all the frequencies of my router so I can connect to a bullet What I have close to my house. that uses the frequency 2312 I think 2ff7e9595c
Comments